ABSTRACT
Objective@#To investigate the cause of massive hemoptysis in critical patients, and to evaluate the effect of bronchial artery embolization (BAE) on critical patients with massive hemoptysis.@*Methods@#A retrospective controlled analysis was conducted. The clinical data of 35 patients with life-threatening massive hemoptysis admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) of the First Hospital Affiliated to Guangzhou Medical University from January 2009 to December 2017 were analyzed. The patients were divided into BAE and non-BAE group according to whether receiving BAE or not. BAE patients were subdivided into subgroups: hemoptysis after ventilation and hemoptysis before ventilation subgroups, as well as survival and non-survival subgroups. The etiology of all massive hemoptysis was analyzed. The gender, age, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) score, amount of hemoptysis, whether presence of pleural thickening in chest CT, the length of ICU stay, total length of hospital stay, the duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), clinical effective and prognostic indicators of patients were recorded. The correlation between variables was analyzed by Spearman correlation analysis.@*Results@#All 35 patients were enrolled in the finally analysis. The main cause of critical patients with massive hemoptysis was fungal infection [37.1% (13/35)], followed by pneumonia and abnormal coagulation [17.1% (6/35)], bronchiectasis [11.4% (4/35)], tumor [8.6% (3/35)], etc. In all 35 patients, 27 were treated with BAE and 8 were treated without BAE. There was no difference in gender, age, the length of ICU stay, total length of hospital stay, the duration of MV, amount of hemoptysis, APACHEⅡ score, whether use antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants, or whether presence of pleural thickening in chest CT between the two groups. The rate of hemoptysis remission in BAE group was significantly higher than that of non-BAE group [92.6% (25/27) vs. 25.0% (2/8), P < 0.01], but there was no statistically significant difference in hospital survival as compared with that of non-BAE group [48.1% (13/27) vs. 25.0% (2/8), P > 0.05]. Subgroup analysis showed that 64.3% (9/14) of patients with hemoptysis after ventilation was caused by pulmonary fungal infection, which was significantly higher than those with hemoptysis before ventilation [15.4% (2/13), P = 0.018]. Compared with hemoptysis after ventilation group, the length of ICU stay and the duration of MV in hemoptysis before ventilation group were significantly shortened [the length of ICU stay (days): 12.0 (14.0) vs. 30.0 (81.8), the duration of MV (days): 10.0 (16.0) vs. 25.0 (68.3)], the patients using antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulant drugs was decreased significantly (case: 1 vs. 9, all P < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in gender, age, total length of hospital stay, amount of hemoptysis, APACHEⅡ score, whether presence of pleural thickening in chest CT, the rate of hemoptysis remission, the incidence of secondary BAE or hospital survival rate between the two groups. Compared with the survival subgroup (n = 13), more patients in the non-survival subgroup (n = 14) were treated with antiplatelet or anticoagulants (P < 0.05); and Spearman correlation analysis showed that the survival of the patients with BAE was negatively correlated with the use of antiplatelet or anticoagulants (r = -0.432, P = 0.024). There was no significant difference in the gender, age, the length of ICU day, total length of hospitalization, duration of MV, estimated hemoptysis, APACHE Ⅱ score, or the proportion of pleural thickening between the two groups.@*Conclusions@#The study indicated that the etiology of massive hemoptysis in critical patients was complicated. Fungal infection was the main cause in patients with hemoptysis after ventilation. BAE was effective in the control of massive hemoptysis in ICU, but it was not ideal for patients with abnormal coagulation function or abnormal platelet count or platelet dysfunction from antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs, the overall survival rate was still low.
ABSTRACT
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of prone position ventilation (PPV) on respiratory mechanics and prognosis in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) concurrent with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Methods The data of 36 severe ARDS patients admitted to Department of Critical Care Medicine of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from February 2013 to January 2015, were retrospectively analyzed. They were then divided into two groups according to the presence of ILD or not. The changes in respiratory mechanics and oxygenation indexes were compared before and after PPV treatment in all the patients. Kaplan-Meier method was applied to draw the 60-day survival curves of both groups.Results There were 17 cases with ILD among these 36 severe ARDS patients.① No significant difference was found in baseline data between ILD group and non-ILD group.② Respiratory mechanics and oxygenation pre-PPV and post-PPV: compared with pre-PPV, oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2, mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa) post-PPV was significantly increased in both groups [ILD group : 132.0 (93.5, 172.0) vs. 118.7 (92.0, 147.8); non-ILD group: 126.1 (100.9, 170.0) vs. 109.2 (89.0, 135.0), bothP 0.05], and Crs was lower after PPV treatment in both groups, but without significant difference [non-ILD group: 22.7 (15.2, 27.1) vs. 24.3 (15.9, 48.9); ILD group: 16.2 (12.8, 25.6) vs. 18.9 (12.7, 27.3), bothP> 0.05].④ The 60-day mortality in ILD group was significantly higher than that in non-ILD group [88.2% (15/17) vs. 57.9% (11/19),P = 0.047). It was shown by Kaplan-Meier curves that 60-day survival patients in ILD group was significantly lower than those in non-ILD group (χ2 = 5.658,P = 0.017). Conclusions PPV can improve oxygenation in severe ARDS. Compared with non-ILD group, though the compliance of respiratory system in ILD group is increased during PPV, long-term effect is better in non-ILD group.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effect of the modified spontaneous breathing trail (SBT) on the weaning procedure for elderly ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods Ventilated acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients ready for SBT from January 2013 to November 2014 were enrolled and were divided into 2-hour SBT (conventional SBT) group and 6-hour SBT (modified SBT) group randomly. The following factors were recorded and analyzed: age, gender, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ)score before SBT, mechanical ventilation time before SBT, the oxygenation index before SBT, rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), the outcome of SBT and weaning, the ICU mortality and the length of stay in ICU. Results Forty-one cases were enrolled with 20 cases in 2-hour SBT group and 21 cases in 6-hour SBT group. Patients′age, gender, APACHE Ⅱ score before SBT, mechanical ventilation time before SBT, the oxygenation index before SBT, RSBI and MIP indicated no significant difference in two groups (P > 0.05). There was a significantly higher SBT successful rate (90.0%) in 2-hour SBT group than that in 6-hour SBT group (57.1%)(P = 0.018), but patients passing SBT successfully in 2-hour SBT group showed a significant lower weaning successful rate (72.2%) than those in 6-hour SBT group (100.0%)(P = 0.046). No significant difference was found in ICU morality and the length of stay in ICU in two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions For elderly ventilated COPD patients , a modified SBT may serve as a useful procedure to predict weaning outcome which will increase the ICU mortality and the time of stay in ICU.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effects of sepsis bundles in China.Method An observational study of 43 patients with severe pneumonia and septic shock admitted to the respiratory intertive care unit(1/11/2006-31/12/2007)was carried out.The selection criteria were in accordance with criteria set by International Conference On Sepsis in 2001.Implementation of 6 hours and 24 hours sepsis bundles was divided into 3 continu-ous phases consisting of education,trial,and application phase.A cohort of 43 patients with matched disease his-tory(1/1/2004-31/10/2006)was enrolled as control group.The percentages for categorical variables and mean±SD for continuous variables were reported.Chi-Square test.unpaired Student's t -test.paired-samples t test,univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used.Statistical significance was defined as P＜0.05.Results There were very little significant differences in basic characteristics of patients between the two groups.Compared with control group,the differences in serrum lactate,fluid resuscitation and fluid volume infused within 6 hours and blood glucose control in shock subgroup were significant(P values were 0.024,0.009,0.045,and 0.000,respectively).Compared with control group,the differences in respiratory rate and oxygenation index of bundles group at 72 hours later were significant(P values were 0.033 and 0.041,respectively).Compared with control group,the differences in APACHE Ⅱ score and predicted mortality in shock subgroup of bundles were sig-nificant(P values were 0.017 and 0.040,respectively).Compared with control group,the reduction in absolute mortality was 23.30% in bundles group(P=0.019).Conclusions Implementation of sepsis bundles con-tributes noticeably to the significant reduction in mortality of patients with severe pneumonia and septic shock.